Monday, November 21, 2011

",,,number of yogis...have switched OFF discussions about leadership"

  • SwayamBlog quotes 2 comments found on the web... and comments
    • first comment:
    I have talked with one yuva from India yesterday who lives in Pune and asked him about the situation. He was laughing a lot and telling that there is no real split in the collectivity but just with the leaders who still cannot let go of their egos and superegos. He said that people are not concerned with their stupid power games, they just go to whatever center and enjoy the vibrations and collective meetings. Everyone knows the situation of the council and leaders and he said now nobody is taking them serious anymore and everyone is making fun of them... so the split is only in the leading parties but not at all in the whole collective who do not side with anyone of these people..
    •  second comment
  •  I got a similar feedback from a yogi in Calcutta. He told me that whenever there are sahaj programs, all yogis join together although there might be preferences in "leaders". And that in many rural areas, yogis are not even aware of all this, they meditate together, try to give realisation. Isn't it a bit the same i our countries ? There is a number of yogis who have switched OFF discussions about leadership? But still of course there are collective issues to solve and nevertheless for the sake of the collective consciousness at least there should not be fights. But otherwise, wouldn't be pure ignorance of these issues also be a way of sahaj leadership. To attract attention, isn't it the fire that keeps these issues going on and on ? 
    SwayamBlog comments 
    One good news, and one bad .
    Good news, yogis turn to the real thing, which is the couple meditation/realization, ignoring the power struggles. Though we heard of some quite violent situations in the meetings in Pune some months ago, and the access to Sahaj facilities is not always easy, as was the case of Pune Ashram.
     The bad news is more like hidden behind those reports. The trustees (whoever they might be) have the hand on the finances, on the assets, the facilities, and the organization of the seminars. A yogi may enjoy going to a meeting.
    But to whom is he going to pay his contribution?Which seminar is he going to attend at Christmas? Do we not have some kind of paper or badge for an affiliation? This is what has been happening in Russia. discrimination against who was supporting the other group, and many people remained vetoed from attending the official programs.
    After the "Arab Spring", after the "Indignados", after "Occupy Wall Street", after the "Anna Hazare Movement", shall we witness some "Sahaj Spring"? ( this is just a question)

No comments:

Post a Comment